Curriculum
Y1 · XII · #19Chemical bonds

Chemical bonding

Introduction

Why do atoms bother bonding at all? The short answer: bonding lowers the overall energy of a system, giving atoms a more stable electron arrangement (often resembling a noble gas). But how atoms bond depends heavily on what kinds of atoms are involved. In this lesson, we'll link electronegativity — a concept you've already met — to the three main types of chemical bonding: ionic, covalent, and metallic.

The bonding spectrum

Instead of thinking of ionic and covalent bonding as two totally separate boxes, it's more accurate to picture a continuous spectrum, with pure covalent bonding at one end and pure ionic bonding at the other. Polar covalent bonds sit in between — they are covalent bonds that have gained some "ionic character" because electrons are shared unequally (Talbot, p. 134).

Using electronegativity differences

We can estimate where a bond sits on this spectrum by calculating the difference in electronegativity (ΔEN) between the two bonded atoms:

  • ΔEN < 0.5 → essentially non-polar covalent (e.g. the C–H bond)
  • 0.5 ≤ ΔEN ≤ 1.7polar covalent
  • ΔEN > 1.7 → likely ionic (e.g. francium fluoride, FrF)

(Talbot, p. 134)

Remember: these numbers are guidelines, not strict laws of nature — real bonding is more subtle, and chemists still study unusual cases (see the box below).

Worked examples

Example 1: Cl₂ EN(Cl) = 3.2 for both atoms ΔEN = 3.2 − 3.2 = 0 → Non-polar covalent bond, Cl–Cl (Talbot, p. 135)

Example 2: HI EN(H) = 2.2, EN(I) = 2.7 ΔEN = 2.7 − 2.2 = 0.5 → Borderline, but classified as polar covalent (Talbot, p. 135)

Example 3: LiF EN(Li) = 1.0, EN(F) = 4.0 (approx

Ask ChemBuddy about this →
Source excerpts

From Chemistry for the IB Diploma 3e · Talbot

p.134relevance 7.7

Electronegativity values (Pauling scale) There are some simple rules for predicting the type of chemical bond based upon the electronegativity differences: ■ If the difference in electronegativity values is greater than 1.7, then the bond is likely to b e i onic. For example, francium fluoride (FrF) would be highly ionic. ■ If the difference in electronegativity values is less …

p.135relevance 7.7

S2.1 The ionic model 123 ■Charge-shift bonds Israeli chemist Sason Shaik and French chemist Philippe Hiberty collaborated to study molecules using computer simulations based on Linus Pauling’s valence bond theory. One of the molecules they studied was the fluorine molecule, F2, which they found was best described by including an ionic form, F+ F−, with the familiar covalent for…

p.208relevance 7.4

S2: Models of bonding and structure 196 Metallic bonding is favoured by atoms with low values of electronegativity; covalent bonding is favoured by atoms with high values of electronegativity; and ionic bonding is favoured where one atom has a low value of electronegativity and the other a high value (Table S2.29). n Binary ionic compounds consist of a metal and a non-metal: fo…

p.186relevance 7.3

HL ONLY S2: Models of bonding and structure 174 Nature of science: Theories Explaining molecular bonds Chemical bonding theory was introduced using Lewis formulas. The Am erican ch emist Gi lbert Le wis (1 875–1946) fir st de veloped th ese diagrams in 1902 as a teaching tool for students. These electron dot diagrams allow us to predict the number of bonds an atom forms (known …

C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂ → 6CO₂ + 6H₂O + ATP
Made with curiosity · ChemLab